Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

the cost estimates I’ve seen have been all over the place.

But the high concept is pretty clear. The thorium reactors don’t need all the protection that the light water reactors require.

Further, there’s lots of waste thorium being stored in various places which can be burned. As well some designs like Transatomic will burn waste uranium.

Finally, the designs are modular. They can be created on a factory floor and shipped off. This naturally makes their cost curves bend down as they scale up production.


47 posted on 09/11/2015 3:30:54 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

I agree they have lots of expected potential and likely cheaper than traditional nukes. But that is a different comparison...


48 posted on 09/11/2015 5:43:44 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Breeder reaction:

Thorium + neutron -—> Protactinium isotope + decay = Uranium 233 !


51 posted on 09/13/2015 8:26:14 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson