You’re saying Obama knows the truth Qiviut... but Obama wants the lies... to fool... people in his administration? Or like Benghazi is his administration ‘in the know’? Why the lies then?
Is the purpose of the lies to direct military policy in an Obama desired direction? Is the military the target of the lies?
I appreciate all the help... I’m still not getting the ‘second step’... who’s suppose to be tricked by the lies - and to what benefit. I might have a block on this issue... I’ll reread... again thanks for the help.
Or like Benghazi is his administration ‘in the know’? Why the lies then?
************************************
Obama & his administration (top advisors, cabinet members, czars & those in the military who have replaced those Obama could not utilize for his purposes) are all on the same page.
The Obama political agenda (destruction of America) is supreme - above national security, above the welfare of the citizens of the country, above the rule of law, and certainly above the ‘truth’ if it does not agree with his agenda. Obama cannot take criticism or dissent from anyone, including now the analysts who are reporting we are not winning against ISIS when he claims we are knocking them back. His sycophants know this, have been told reports that contradict what Obama is saying are not welcome & make sure he doesn’t get what he’s told them he doesn’t want to see. It surely makes it easier for the enemedia to continue to uphold the Obama agenda if not faced with truths that conflict with the administration lies. With Benghazi, the political agenda was that we had AQ on the run, so of course, there was no way the administration was going to say the attack was caused by terrorists & they wanted to give the enemedia something else to report (the video). A lot of low infos still buy the lies ... many WANT to buy the lies (first black president & all that - got that legacy to secure) .... some of America is waking up, but it might be too little, too late.
Obama is a Muslim. It took me a very loooong time to come to that conclusion.
What other conclusion could one come to, I ask? This suspicion became confirmed by this Iran Deal. The deal is suicide for our country, so you go back and reason through what has systematically been said and done.
Obama said if there was a problem, he would side with the Muslims. He has bowed to and elevated and romanticized every Muslim in sight. He has never remotely admonished them personally.
In the theater the Middle East, it was Obama who fired and retired over 300 seasoned Generals, others resigned. There was a reason for this wholesale removal of the best and the brightest, right? You’ve got Brennan in the cabinet at Defense, and he speaks Arabic to a DC audience, requiring a translation to English on the screen. You’ve got Valerie Jarret running the Executive Branch, as an Arab. Why and what would the reason be?
Why would you empty Iraq of all US military and leave a vacuum— a vacuum guaranteed to be filled with territory seeking Muslims, who live by “MIGHT makes right”.
Read the shrinking of our military and hard assets during the most globally dangerous time in history for democracies. There would be a reason for this whole sale diminishment of our fighting men, and turning our military to a gay institution, heavily filled with women. What would that reason be?
It’s all there. Obama is true to his word. In every way he sides with the Middle East Muslims to our peril.
Muslims do this sort of thing and are allowed to pretend, allude and lie, in order to advance Islam. Even to kill. The pin prick air strikes on ISIS. Ever wonder why they are always unserious, too few, too little, too late, off target, because we have no one on the ground there to direct hits, other than satellite command?
Obama wants it this way. He can give up ISIS soldiers and even a tiny few of their leaders, if it advances the Muslim aims for the Middle East, and gains territory for Islam.
Now comes Iran. Obama wants it this way.