[SoothingDave]

You can accommodate when you are one of many. If she was a deputy clerk, she could be excused from duties she has a moral objection to. Some other deputy could do them.

But she’s not a deputy. She is head of the office. The office has to do this. She must exercise her power in order to see that it is done.

There is no way to accommodate her objections with her job responsibilities. She is responsible for every license that comes out of her office.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: There is no way to accommodate her objections with her job responsibilities.

There is a way — PASS A LAW EXEMPTING PEOPLE LIKE HER and transferring the responsibility to people who have no religious objections.

North Carolina already passed such a law, what’s stopping Kentucky from doing the same?

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

She is responsible for every license that comes out of her office. . . .There is no way to accommodate her objections with her job responsibilities

. . . not because she got herself elected to a job she conscientiously objected to fulfilling, but because five judges in Washington decided - over the objections of four others - that the job she got herself elected to entailed behavior she considered obscene.

Congress should pass a law overriding the SCOTUS ruling - and stipulating

Article III Section 2 :

the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

that it is not reviewable by SCOTUS.