Ping!
Read, and think seriously about what it means.
I think Jim toasted him
... motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be substantially burdened unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest...
This means that an act motivated by religious belief by an individual and interfered with by government will be reviewed by the Court under strict scrutiny, the highest scrutiny.