Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/08/2015 12:53:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The washed-up shriveled up old hag wouldn’t treat a Republican like that.


2 posted on 09/08/2015 12:55:41 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Sad.

Very, very sad.


3 posted on 09/08/2015 12:57:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Small penis, no balls.


4 posted on 09/08/2015 12:59:08 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Since she wont do her job then she should stick grinding up Viagra pills for her husband’s oatmeal.


5 posted on 09/08/2015 12:59:32 PM PDT by Wilderness Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

6 posted on 09/08/2015 1:01:51 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

And if Clinton were a Republican she would have thrown everything at her, including the kitchen sink


7 posted on 09/08/2015 1:02:22 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Senators conduct their senatorial business via personal email? Really. Senators are exposed to a lot of secret communications and I find it hard to believe that they are allowed to do that.

So I would back up to her premise which is that she continued what she did in the senate. Of course SoS is a much more sensitive job. But before we go there I would probe why she used personal email as a senator.

Always start with your opponents premise and attack that first.


9 posted on 09/08/2015 1:05:02 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Chicken.


10 posted on 09/08/2015 1:09:31 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Beware the Wisconsin Weasel - GOPe Plan B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s not true, she’s protecting Clinton and her relationship! Lying beach!


11 posted on 09/08/2015 1:12:06 PM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Perhaps Mitchell could have pressed it and lost the opportunity to ask the other questions. “

So she rendered the entire interview spurious.


12 posted on 09/08/2015 1:13:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What is the source of this thinking that the media exist to extract an apology from some political transgressor? I’d be satisfied if they just asked the questions that reveal some level of the truth and I’ll decide whether an apology will suffice or if more stringent methods are required.


15 posted on 09/08/2015 1:34:17 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No afraid of ending the interview, little Andrea was afraid she’d get an ashtray or lamp thrown at her...

Two -itches with the same pea brain sense...


19 posted on 09/08/2015 2:05:47 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ("It's the hard working, tax paying citizens of the United States that are suffering..."Go TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Andrea is an ugly old RAT hack. So there.


20 posted on 09/08/2015 2:08:33 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Andrea is claiming that she’s cowardly and unprofessional but I think the truth is that Andrea’s a Progressive ideologue working her agenda.


21 posted on 09/08/2015 3:01:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The real issue was Mrs. Greenspan’s terrible questions. Both of her “probing” questions ended with a statement that could be addressed with a simple ‘yes, or no’. Of course, when you’re trying to dodge the issue, you answer ‘yes or no’. Either Mrs. Greenspan was intentionally giving Hillary an out, or she was too dumb to know what she was asking.


22 posted on 09/08/2015 3:03:03 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Andrea Mitchell: I didn’t ask Hillary some questions because I thought she’d end the interview

Clinton's refusal to answer a tough question says more about her.

Mitchell's refusal to ask the hard questions says more about her.

23 posted on 09/08/2015 3:14:01 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< | :)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson