Posted on 09/06/2015 6:06:45 PM PDT by Ray76
(Feb 18, 2015) ISIS has threatened to flood Europe with half a million migrants from Libya in a 'psychological' attack against the West, it was claimed today.
Transcripts of telephone intercepts published in Italy claim to provide evidence that ISIS is threatening to send 500,000 migrants simultaneously out to sea in hundreds of boats in a 'psychological weapon' against Europe if there is military intervention against them in Libya.
Many would be at risk of drowning with rescue services unable to cope. But authorities fear that if numbers on this scale arrived, European cities could witness riots.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Lock the doors, deny entry, and start delivering nukes to Iran and ISIS. Airmail them via the cargo bay.
We need those Muslims here in the same way as Europe needs another 500,000 Muslims there. We need to accept whatever number is required for them to start killing Liberal people who support their arrival, to the extent necessary to wake the survivors up.
Muslims need to go in mass numbers to San Fransisco, New York and Boston, provided they are the really militant types. We need vicious and violent Wahhabis to confront the populations there.
We are at a point now where we need to speed up Liberal's confrontation with reality while we still have sufficient numbers to repair the damage after the "formerly Liberal" survivors figure it out.
Excellent post and soooo true. God Bless.
Obama is two faced and evil.
Nothing to worry about, Unum! I was assured last night by religious freepers that not only were the able-bodied men arriving in Europe in droves staunch Christians, ISIS was only pulling a head-fake with this threat. So nothing to see here!
No doubt this flood tide from both Syria and Libya is a mixture of genuine refugees, opportunists, sleepers and criminals. The unknown aspect is how many of each category there may be. If we want to stop this phenomenon, there are two ways (other than the politically non-viable suggestion of attacking refugee boats).
One is to organize refugee camps in Italy and Greece with massive resources for assessing the actual nature of the migrants case by case, returning or imprisoning the non-qualifiers, and assisting the genuine cases in some sort of international system. If in fact the percentage of genuine refugees is 30 to 50 per cent (my rough guess) then the totals become somewhat less formidable especially when divided among different countries.
The second option is to invade Libya and co-operate with Putin and Assad, return all migrants to source but into situations that are less unstable and better policed by an international security presence, then aggressively eliminate all traces of ISIS in a no-holds-barred attack on them with superior force.
Option (a) would be expensive and option (b) would probably involve both large expense and a moderate death toll of our own soldiers and some civilians assisting in the initial stages.
Doing nothing is probably the worst of all options because this will open flood gates so strong that Europe really will be overwhelmed and then it will be North America seeing a vast flood of European migrants.
I prefer option (b), allowing ISIS to continue expanding their power is too dangerous a geopolitical option in that it is fairly obvious that they would not be inhibited in attacks on a massive scale once they consolidated power in one or two states. That day is apparently just around the corner so we need to wake up and get after them. They are probably secretly backed by powerful forces in the region and some of our intel resources probably know who — but whatever the answer is, however troubling it may be, the truth must come out and then we must take this on like we took on the Axis in WW-II. The actual balance of military powers in this case is much less formidable but unlike the Axis powers, these jokers can destroy us with a few lucky moves such as acquisition of nukes or biological weapons.
And as we can also see quite clearly, there must be a rather large risk of being overwhelmed by bogus sleeper elements in the refugee tide, so for that reason alone, we need to get a plan together.
I hope we don’t need to wait until 2017 to get some focus on these issues — we are already two years late and can’t afford to wait another two years.
NYC already lost 3,000 to Wahhabists. Why don’t you take some into your little town? What a nasty post.
This article was clearly wrong. They didn’t use boats, and they sent more than 500,000. /sarc
Plans are already underway...
http://dailykenn.blogspot.com/2015/02/75000-syrian-muslim-refugees-are-coming.html
I’m wondering if the churches that are benefiting from the government aide also think abortion is ok. Just wondering.
I hope you are right.
Those “refugees” are populations mobilized by Obama’s asymmetric war on the West. He works to arm AQ/MB/ISIS et al; and destabilizes populations both here and abroad, overthrowing countries and displacing populations.
This article was published almost seven months ago.
Fascinating article. Thanks for posting
People did not make the connection. They count that as an act of "terrorism". A fluke. Something done by extremists, and not "ordinary Muslims."
They do not grasp that "ordinary Muslims" are like "Gremlins" and if you feed them after midnight, they turn evil.
"Ordinary Muslims" have a Jekyll/Hyde character, and this needs to be recognized and understood by people who move governmental policy. This dual nature of their character flows directly from their religion. It is simply incompatible with Western ideas of Freedom, Equality and Tolerance.
At this point, "Telling" them won't do any good. They must be shown. The best way to show them is to put them up close and personal to the threat.
What a nasty post.
Yes, it was a nasty post, but I am all out of kind, sweet sounding ideas to fix what will quickly turn into a crises. I have reached the point where I think that trying to separate liberal policy makers from the consequences of their ideas is the wrong strategy. We need to push their policies even harder so that they can crack up quickly enough for some people to be saved.
We are the new Rome, and if we don't do something different from what Rome did, we will end up just like them.
Ordinary Muslims cheer on the “Extremist Muslims” but they just don’t want to get their hands bloody.
Yes. Exactly the point. They’ve made good on their threat.
Yes, I agree. I try to spread it's information to as many people as I can whenever the topic comes up. I cannot find fault with his reasoning, though his solution is very unsettling.
We Americans are not used to thinking in terms of killing mass numbers of people as a strategic necessity, but that is where the evidence appears to be pointing.
Though the extremists are generally a plurality, they carry the mandate of their religion when they murder non-believers or defiers of Islam.
No one dare try to stop them or they will be killed too.
They follow the same methodology as the Gaystapo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.