Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

He sure doesn’t seem to be a friend of the Second Amendment. This, and other comments about guns I’ve seen in his feed.


72 posted on 09/06/2015 9:02:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz; CodeToad; impimp

I wasn’t planning on wading into this pillow fight because, like the USMA pillow fight, it was starting to get vicious. But, I think that each and every one of you have mis-read the Constitution. The document only means what 5 of 9 black robed justices says that it means, unless each and every one of you is willing to shed some blood to change their ruling. We have the 2nd Amendment to preserve our personal arms to remind those who govern to do so wisely. But the SC could change that with the change of one black robe. At one time, burning the American flag would have gotten you a trip to jail. Now it is covered under the 1st Amendment. At one time, euthanizing your unborn child got you and at least one other a trip to jail for murder. Now it’s an un-enumerated right. You can continue to “discuss” the meaning of the Constitution and the BOR, but remember that the SCOTUS will continue determine the meaning, like it or not.


89 posted on 09/06/2015 9:25:06 AM PDT by Purdue77 ("shall not be infringed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson