To: Las Vegas Ron
I recognize that there are many things explicitly relating to states in the constitution. The problem is the federal government reaching into things under state control according to the constitution.
51 posted on
09/06/2015 8:42:48 AM PDT by
impimp
To: impimp
I recognize that there are many things explicitly relating to states in the constitution. The problem is the federal government reaching into things under state control according to the constitution.This particular ruling does not violate states rights. It prevents states from illegally infringing on an area where the 10th amendment prohibits infringement.
55 posted on
09/06/2015 8:45:16 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: impimp; Lazamataz
See Laz’s 55 on this thread. He answered it perfectly.
61 posted on
09/06/2015 8:49:11 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(I stand with Kim Davis! I will not comply!)
To: impimp
The second amendment isn’t one of those overreaches.
62 posted on
09/06/2015 8:49:39 AM PDT by
MortMan
(The rule of law is now the law of rulings - Judicial, IRS, EPA...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson