Posted on 09/04/2015 9:57:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
We’re in a weird place as a party when Trump, the would-be strongman who’s going to smash sclerotic American government as we know it, is more of a “rule of law” guy than Ted Cruz is. And way, way more of one than Mike Huckabee is.
Trump prefers an accommodation in which gay couples can get their licenses, as the Obergefell ruling requires, and Davis can opt out so that she’s not involved in something that violates her religious beliefs. But she doesn’t want to opt out. She wants to force the whole office to opt out by forbidding her deputies from issuing licenses without her approval. As recently as yesterday, during her contempt hearing, her lawyers were warning people that marriage licenses issued today by her staff (there have already been two as of 10:30 a.m. ET) while she’s in jail won’t be valid because they lack her signature as county clerk — and she might not be wrong about that. What she’s doing, as Charles Cooke put it, isn’t so much seeking a conscientious objection for herself as demanding a right of secession for Rowan County from the post-Obergefell legal regime. Cruz and Huckabee seem okay with that. Trump evidently isn’t.
The other simple answer is rather than going through this, [because] its really a very, very sticky situation, a terrible situation 30 miles away they have other places, they have many other places where you get licensed, and you have them actually quite nearby, Mr. Trump said. Thats another alternative. I hate to see her being put in jail. I understand what theyre doing. It would be certainly nice if she didnt do it, but other people in her office do it but from what I understand she wont allow other people in her office to do it.
Bottom line, host Joe Scarborough said, is that if Supreme Court makes a decision, thats the law of land, right?
You have to go with it, Mr. Trump said. The decisions been made, and that is the law of the land.…
She can take a pass and let somebody else in the office do it in terms of religious, so you know, its a very tough situation, but we are a nation, as I said yesterday, were a nation of laws, he said. And I was talking about borders and I was talking about other things, but you know, it applies to this, also, and the Supreme Court has ruled. It would be nice to have other people in her office do what they have to do.
Smart point, but the Cruz/Huckabee take on this is that a “lawless” Supreme Court opinion doesn’t count as “law” the way a statute does. Cruz, at least, knows better, but it’s in his political interest to push that argument. I’m curious to see if he comes after Trump over this at one of the debates, sensing that it’s a rare chance for him to out-populist Mr. Populism. If he does, Trump should come back: Who gets to decide which court opinions are sufficiently “lawless” that they needn’t be enforced? We’re left with Trump, the alleged revolutionary, standing up for the long tradition of judicial review while more mainstream GOP pols argue that that tradition has been so discredited by left-wing double standards that conservatives should take the same a la carte approach to law enforcement. Let every county clerk go their own way. In hindsight, Obama should have cited his, ahem, deep religious convictions as grounds for granting executive amnesty.
Exit question via a Twitter buddy: How come no one’s standing up for the conscience rights of Davis’s deputy clerks? What if one of them enthusiastically supports gay marriage and wants to issue licenses in Davis’s stead? The state’s telling Davis that she has a duty to obey Supreme Court rulings and she’s telling her deputies that they have a duty to obey her personal religious beliefs. Why is the former less legitimate than the latter?
About what I figured...
But lookee Pelham
We have Lapsed Catholic Franklin Graham besmirchers here
Ignorance
You can always tell the prejudice of folks by their ignorance
But I don’t see you pointing out any inaccuracies. Odd all you can come up with is ‘lapsed catholic’ and ‘besmerchers.’
Now unless you CAN come up with a way to rewrite FG’s own actions, I don’t really see what my faith, lack of it IYO, or cost of Skittles has to do with anything.
About what I figured.
.
>> “If Trump is BS, why do you wallow in Trump threads?” <<
.
Because that is where the low-info FReepers that blindly follow the “White Obama” (Trump) are.
.
You have “found” a man made caricature of him.
He revealed how to find and follow himself in Matthew 5, but you have openly rejected what he revealed there.
Matthew 7 deals with what will happen with those that take that path.
This isn’t snide; it is what Yeshua said.
I wouldn’t have anyone suffer that judgement.
.
.
>> “You try to imply here that God has some of the mind of Satan.” <<
.
No, you have simply inferred it.
Does Yeshua have the “mind of Satan” when he says “Depart from me ye workers of iniquity?”
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.