[Prospero]

This is precisely the administration riding on the wrong side of the road, taking both sides of the middle. Are they to accommodate peyote eaters and Rastafarians, would the EEOC sue them for firing drivers who refused to drive without pot breaks?

What's the difference between what this trucking firm is "accused" of and an airline refusing to keep stewardesses who refused to look after their appearances?

Is the trucking firm requiring them to drink the alcohol? Were these employees refusing also to deliver pornography?

They are not even required to touch the stuff.

The EEOC likely will not prevail, so this is harassment, meant to intimidate the social order to comply with Islam.

[Old Sarge]

this is harassment, meant to intimidate the social order to comply with Islam.