No he is caving to a tyrannical unconstitutional court opinion which created a law in opposition to the laws of Nature.
Show me the statute that the clerk violated. Show me where the court is given power to jail this woman.
Trump has shown that the only backbone he has is to attack Jeb Bush and say what we want to hear on immigration. But what if the Supreme Court tells him to sit down and shut up. Will he cave?
Time to rethink my previous support.
Trump is about a gamble. He is definitely no politician, so what he does should be the measure of his opinion and not those off-the-cuff thoughts he weaves together. He was talking to Hugh Hewitt on the radio and Hewitt started asking him the name, rank, and serial number of the various leaders of various terrorist groups around the world. Trump called it a gotcha question. (It was.) He said to forget those details and just know that he’s a delegator, that he finds the best people, and that shortly after taking office he’ll know more about those people than Hewitt ever knew, because he’ll find the best person to be in charge. Besides, he says, who cares who they are. By the time the presidency changes, those guys could be dead or gone.
I agree. Does it matter that someone doesn’t know a name? They’re not auditioning for the role of double agent in the guy’s friendship group. They’re auditioning for the role of whack-a-mole.
So with the Scotus. Trump says “they ruled”. We have to deal with it, he says.
The important thing to me is if he has ever indicated in his past an ability to work around, finesse, or even violate the spirit while manipulating the letter of the law? Has he ever worked to change a law?
All that said, you are right about Cruz. He’s the best.
And Huckabee, to be honest with you, was on this weeks ago. And Rand Paul is no slouch. If I have to choose between one of them and Bush, then it’s gonna be one of them.
Stop pretending you were for Trump you insufferable troll. How have you not been zotted yet?