[Mr Rogers]

The courts have authority in this. Why? Contract law. If you have a written contract that allows X to fine Y, but does not allow X to suspend Y, then doing the latter is a breach of contract. It then becomes a legal matter.

[veracious]

I understand what your saying and it does have some merit. However, the contracts are with a corporation, which defines the rules the contractees operate under. The rules (of this domain) include process for redress of grievances. It seems a violation of contract for an contractee to use an outside party to change something which is purely defined and owned by the domain.