Jake Sullivan could be next ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3332389/posts
Some documents have also been manipulated. Their classified markings have been removed or changed, which would explain why she has changed her public statements about what was in her possession and when. Initially she claimed unequivocally that there was no classified material. She now says, The facts are I did not send nor did I receive material marked classified.
This appears to be the basis for her defense: that some of the documents classified markings were removed or changed without permission before she saw them.
By whom? There are only three people who were close enough to her to have had that kind of access: Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan, and her longtime Gal Friday, Huma Abedin.
Ms. Mills, Mrs. Clintons Valerie Jarrett and shadowy hatchet gal, is a lawyer, which may present evidentiary issues for the government as much of her communication with Mrs. Clinton may be privileged.
Ms. Abedin, who has had her own issues involving her husband, former Rep. Anthony Weiner, her familys alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and her extracurricular employment activities while at State, is not a lawyer and may be more exposed. She lawyered up recently, but like Ms. Mills, she knows too much about the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton operations and how they mixed with Mrs. Clintons State Department (and server) to be sacrificed.
This leaves Mr. Sullivan, the outsider. If its true that he is cooperating with the FBI, Mrs. Clinton may try to smear him as a John Dean-style rogue, who either didnt alert her to unmarked classified material or removed the markings himself and is now trying to save his own hide.
Hopefully he kept very good records in a secret location
Just a thought
Remembering all the Chicago investigations.
Once the FBI was called in there were quite a few (reluctant witnesses) who wore wires or willingly had their phones tapped.
We can dream!
If Mills was on the government payroll, there is no attorney-client privilege.