[usconservative]

Further, you do understand the difference between the Hobby Lobby case, where the US Supreme Court RECOGNIZED Hobby Lobby's right to refuse to carry certain abortifacents because it violated Hobby Lobby's owners religious beliefs, correct?

The same USSC and Federal Court System which is now saying that INDIVIDUALS do not have the right to refuse to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples.

You do see the hypocrisy between the two, and the inconsistency in both rulings don't you? If not, we're done.

[Tau Food]

I gave you an example in post 199. Do you really think any one of our founding fathers would have said that the teacher can have naked children in his classroom because of his religion?

Get serious. They believed in the rule of law. Religion is not an automatic excuse to do anything that you like. And, that's the way you're trying to present this.