Posted on 08/31/2015 12:16:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
They should have just waited — Iran will take care of it in just a few years.
Patsies.
Note to self: Do not discuss bringing down the government on internet chat rooms, or by telephone or any other electronic means.
Pipe bombs are now considered WMDs?...more like pansies everywhere!
That includes Free Republic private reply. :)
Or at least turn down all pipe bomb offers made from chat rooms.
Wondering if FR is currently “on the list” as a terrorist patriot forum since this site may facilitate “belligerent” sentiment and actions of those opposing the US gov’t?
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 specifies indefinite detention for those “beligerents” who dare oppose our immoral corrupt unconstitutuonal gov’t minders.
Looks like it’s too late now...citizens shoulda gathered to protest BEFORE NDAA.
The NDAA: a clear and present danger to American liberty | Naomi ...
www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/ cifamerica/... Proxy Highlight
Feb 29, 2012 ... Under the act, anyone can be described as a ‘belligerent”. ... to apprehend and to indefinitely detain those suspected of threatening the security ...
Wartime Detention Provisions in Recent Defense Authorization ...
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42143.pdf Proxy Highlight
May 28, 2015 ... The 2012 NDAA authorizes the detention of certain categories of ... permit the military detention of U.S. citizens believed to be enemy belligerents, ... NDAA into law, President Obama stated that he would “not authorize the indefinite military .
Definition of belligerent in English:
adjective
1Hostile and aggressive: a bull-necked, belligerent old man
1.1Engaged in a war or conflict, as recognized by international law.
I wouldn’t be at all surprised if these guys were mouthing off and a plant egged them on, supplied the means, and then arrested them. It’s SOP.
You don’t need WMDS to start a revolution. Just get up, get away from the computer and go talk to people about your candidate. Or you can be Trump.
It should be recalled that Tim McVeigh thought that his bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in OKC would also trigger a conservative uprising.
RE: Wondering if FR is currently “on the list” as a terrorist patriot forum since this site may facilitate “belligerent” sentiment and actions of those opposing the US gov’t?
My cable/internet/phone company used to be the Long Island based company -— CableVision ( I’ve since switched to Verizon FiOS ).
When they were my internet service provider, Free Republic was FILTERED OUT by their system as a hate site.
Democratic Underground on the other hand, was NOT filtered out.
Go figure.
what is the first rule of fight club?
Re Post 6: absolutely.
Re Post 7: yes, that too.
Appreciate your reasoned reply.
A candidate’s ethical conduct in office correlates to fearing the consequences of betraying citizen trust.
Protest by citizenry makes politicians uneasy, since it exposes their misdeeds and leads to shameful ouster from office.
Electing the right candidate is key, no doubt. And Cruz is the one I currently trust most.
However, even Cruz needs respectful amount of fear for betraying those who he represents in office.
NDAA of 2012 permits the US gov’t to arbitrarily deny US citizenry the ability to gather to protest in opposition of those who govern us. That is a Huge Big deal.
We now have just lost the right to gather in protest outside of the US Supreme Court.
Muzzling, surveiling and control of citizenry is nearly completely in place.
If we lose most of our bill of rights ammendment freedom’s (1st & 4th), be assured we’ll lose the 2nd soon.
Patsies.
Well, the are pasty for sure.
the=they
So, what’s the end game here? To use the pipe bombs, ghost write a book for Obama, and then become a “respected” college professor?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.