Replies

“Did Luntz actually say this? I wonder if he included Christians as an ethnic group?”

No, I doubt Luntz said that or something like that. But what he does do is poll people, SUPPOSEDLY impartially, to see what should work for Republicans. And his ‘results’ were clear as day. If the Republican rush in, head-first, to Amnesty, they will a higher percentage of Hispanic votes than if they don’t. In other words, up to a million more Hispanics will vote Republican due to it.

The Republicans candidates and office holders, most of them being TOTAL IDIOTS, eat that up and spend all their time trying to figure out a way to get Amnesty through, while convincing the base that it’s not Amnesty...and so far, thankfully, that hasn’t happened.

As to the Republican (Christian) base, Luntz simply tells the candidates that they will vote Republican anyway, because they have no other choice - and they believe him. As for the fact that something like 5 Republicans will stay home for every Hispanic vote they get from pandering...he doesn’t tell them that. Nor does he tell them that once Amnesty is passed, these people will quickly be naturalized and vote Democrat, thereby reducing the party to rubble (which could be what he wants, see below).

As to the base SCREAMING at the top of their lungs that they don’t want Amnesty, Luntz simply tells them it’s a small number of people being egged on by talk radio and manipulating the system through social media, etc. The REAL REPUBLICANS are much more reasonable and accommodating to those that are hear illegally. That’s why we’re ignored...they trust Luntz and people like him MUCH MORE than their own phone calls.

As to why Luntz is doing this - one reason for certain: The big-money donors DEMAND cheap labor, meaning Open Borders and Amnesty, and they simply do not give a shit about the future of the country...and it is the Big Money that ultimately pays Luntz’s salary. The second reason may or may not apply to him, but a lot of Republican male ‘strategists’ have turned out being gay. No idea here and it’s not possible to find anything about his personal life on the web (although it is typically possible that information for most people at his level). I do not have a problem with gay strategists, but they should be open about it and they should be used where it helps candidates understand their base (maybe in some limited outreach), rather than driving their own personal agendas (as seen from other strategists that have come out of the closet). Again, I’m not saying this about Luntz, I just don’t know either way, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that were the case.