Ramos’ “them again us” victim act is getting tired. He made a bundle in the US relying on his “victim” status.
Ramos brags about his dual citizenship...but, is he reporting his Mexican income to the IRS? If not that would be illegal.
Plus his obvious hatred for the US makes me think he’s got a lot to hide....tax-wise and otherwise. For instance:
<><> how many US govt checks is he, his family, and his Univision staff cashing?
<><> how much of his income is he wire-transferring to Mexico?
<><> are the stats WRT his univsion/fusion audience accurate? Couple newsmen went to jail recently for falsifying circulation numbers to dupe advertisers.
<><> Who is financing Ramos’ Third World plot to overthrow the US govt? Could it be Univision-— $9 billion in debt, staging an IPO to bail themselves? BTW, Mexico’s Televisa has a stake in Univision.
What is Ramos’ stake?
FYI, I despise Whorehey Ramos...but if he pays taxes on his income to the US government and whatever state he lives in, then it isn’t our concern what he does with it afterwards. He, like the rest of us, has every right to invest or spend his legally-earned and taxed money anywhere he’d like.
That said, his obligation is to report his worldwide income to the IRS, all of which is taxable here because he is a citizen (and this would be the case if he was merely a permanent resident). However, he would also be eligible for a tax credit on income earned outside of the US, with the credit being the lesser of the US tax or the (presumably) Mexican tax on said income. The guy is worth $200 million+, so I assume that he has good accountants...though if I were a betting man I’d place a wager on at least some shenanigans. I’d say that an audit is called for in this case.
As to the rest, I don’t know whether his role in Univision is that of merely being an employee/anchorman, or it is bigger than that. Even if he is a part owner, it doesn’t necessarily make him responsible for everything that the network does.
As mentioned, I despise the racialist, opportunistic, dishonest SOB...but even people such as him deserve a fair examination of their affairs, and the same right to do with their own money as we, ourselves, have.
Ramos is part of the Chicanos dream to create Aztlan, a Mexican nation covering all the American South West, his declared loyalty is to Mexico not the U.S.
When Ramos open his mouth to attack U.S. immigration laws, we must remind him that Mexico has one of the most draconian immigrations laws in the world.
“Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.” (Center for Security Policy ^ | April 13, 2006 | J. Michael Waller)
To solve our immigration crisis U.S. should adopt the Mexican immigration laws, probably the most draconian in the world.
Mexico’s Ideal Immigration Law—Let’s try it here at home
Center for Security
Policy ^ | April 13, 2006 | J. Michael Waller
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the US look at
how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem.
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are: in the country legally; have the means to sustain themselves economically; not destined to be burdens on society; of economic and social benefit to society; of good character and have no criminal records; and contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that: immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor foreign visitors do not violate their visa status; foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics; foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported; foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported; those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense.
The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?
If the United States adopted the law, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society: Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national
interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country: Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86) A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned:
Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121).
Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says, “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article125)
Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty
or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the countryis subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.
Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
I am sure Mexicans would be proud that the U.S. copy their more enlightened laws.