To: rktman
It’s not binding on us unless it’s approved on the Hill.
7 posted on
08/27/2015 9:35:57 AM PDT by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: TBP
That won’t take the lyin’ king long. CON-gress is a non-starter anymore as he has shown.
12 posted on
08/27/2015 9:40:04 AM PDT by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to deprive me of mine. Kinda weird.)
To: TBP
“It’s not binding on us unless it’s approved on the Hill.”
A treaty can not over ride the Constitution. Any attempt to enforce such a treaty would be met with... An unfriendly response.
13 posted on
08/27/2015 9:41:29 AM PDT by
BigCinBigD
(...Was that okay?)
To: TBP
Unless Corker fixes it for us again...
17 posted on
08/27/2015 9:45:23 AM PDT by
Ingtar
(Capitulation is the enemy of Liberty, or so the recent past has shown.)
To: TBP
It’s not binding on us unless it’s approved on the Hill. Not even then. The Congress cannot ratify a treaty that is a violation of the Constitution.
20 posted on
08/27/2015 9:53:00 AM PDT by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: TBP
...Its not binding on us unless it’s approved on the Hill.
Even then it will be as binding as HRH George III’s attempt to ban the colonists’ guns and ammunition at Lexington. He discovered how binding the order was there and on the road to Concord.
28 posted on
08/27/2015 10:13:18 AM PDT by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson