Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

If the constitution was a document of a kingdom, it would not say jurisdiction. It would say “subject of sovereign.” That is a better way to think of it.

A person who is a citizen of another country is treated under our laws, but ther loyalty lies with their “sovereign.”

Using the examples of the immigrants of the old west, it was the judgement that they came here with the intent to immigrate, that they held no allegiance to the country they left, and subjected themselves to conscription at great peril.

This does not fit the situation of a pregnant immigrant who rushes across the border to give birth in a border town.


93 posted on 08/28/2015 6:04:14 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt
Using the examples of the immigrants of the old west, it was the judgement that they came here with the intent to immigrate, that they held no allegiance to the country they left, and subjected themselves to conscription at great peril.

Agreed. It was never intended to apply to people who had not interest in making this nation their home.

This does not fit the situation of a pregnant immigrant who rushes across the border to give birth in a border town.

Exactly right. Nor does it fit the situation of someone who takes a vacation in this country in order to make a citizen of their newly born child.

98 posted on 08/29/2015 11:27:04 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson