The results would be HI-larious!
Posted on 08/27/2015 4:47:09 AM PDT by don-o
“Somebody planted the sonuvabitch.”
That was one organizer’s immediate assessment after a bomb threat forced about 75 bikers and supporters to disperse from in front of the McLennan County courthouse Saturday morning. The bikers had organized a memorial for the nine people killed at the Twin Peaks shooting in Waco three months ago, but the gathering was also supposed to serve as something of a rally for the 177 bikers arrested that day. But now, thanks to a suspicious cooler and a suitcase, the group dissolved.
Clint Broden, the lawyer most publicly associated with the case, was scheduled to speak. And from the sounds of it, Broden’s address could’ve been illuminating if he’d had the chance to give it—”I will have a lot to say soon, I have been saving it up,” he promised on the event flyer.
It’s still unclear what happened on May 17. Most of the national attention the shootout between cops and bikers garnered focused on the two clubs involved, the Bandidos and the Cossacks—essentially turning into PR campaigns for both sides, with law enforcement and bikers offering two very different interpretations of biker culture. -
(Excerpt) Read more at texasmonthly.com ...
I’m not a biker. See? That was easy.
The results would be HI-larious!
Well, they weren't ambushed (you still can't produce any source for that, remember). As for what I called them? Gangsters, yes. Mafioso, no. I've already explained that mafioso reference to you twice, but you were too slow to comprehend, so I won't bothering attempting again.
"Why is it so hard for you to admit that you said that, and have already determined guilt/criminality all on your own?"
Calling someone a gangster, when they wear their gang insignia for the world to see is not "determining guilt", no matter how many times you try to equate them. You can call a pig a cat a thousands times, but it ain't never going to purr.
Maybe an example will illustrate that point for you, since you don't seem so good with abstract concepts. If you saw these three fine gentlemen approaching you:
I think you would agree you could say they were gangsters, based on their wearing of gang insignia, no?
You also said you had no problem with them getting ambushed.
And those people in your picture, are THEY bikers from the Waco event?
Can’t even admit to what you posted as quoted and linked.
Nice.
No, those don’t look like gangsters to me.
I said “ambushed” (in quotes), not ambushed (without quotes).
There is a difference, as I have already tried to explain to you twice. I guess you really are that stupid.
Yeah, right.
And I quoted you, and you’ve tried wiggling out of what you said, and tried claiming you DIDN’T say it.
Why is it so hard to admit that you did?
No, they are not, they are part of a hypothetical example I was using as an illustration.
I want to be REALLY clear about that, so you don’t misunderstand and try to say later that I claimed the Crips were at Twin Peaks that day.
You’re just going to keep chasing your tail aren’t you?
What, you are an authority on what I think now? Are you a mind reader?
5. I don’t say much but i devour the info.
I’ve reading and learning all along. I am also not inclined to engage trolls. But I am interested.
Do not recall interacting with you on this subject. What point are you trying to make?
LOL, So you can’t admit that you said it, still.
Meaning of “is” still.
Okay.
Fair enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
