Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo

And anyhow your comparison is inapt, with suspicion applicable as to being deliberately disingenuous. It would be Congress’ legal dominion over DOMESTIC affairs that would apply to DOMESTIC affairs. One DOMESTIC affair is, who qualifies to be a citizen. That doesn’t need to be negotiated with, say, Mexico. Only the USA wallows in such folly today.


109 posted on 08/25/2015 7:19:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
And anyhow your comparison is inapt, with suspicion applicable as to being deliberately disingenuous. It would be Congress’ legal dominion over DOMESTIC affairs that would apply to DOMESTIC affairs. One DOMESTIC affair is, who qualifies to be a citizen. That doesn’t need to be negotiated with, say, Mexico. Only the USA wallows in such folly today.

Not sure where you're going with this but I was just responding to the question "what established diplomatic immunity?"

Of course you don't need a treaty if it's a purely domestic matter.

111 posted on 08/25/2015 11:47:24 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson