Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; holdonnow

It’s a good point you make about courts.

The chances that the Mark Levin argument about the meaning of “jurisdiction” will prevail in any currently constituted US Federal court are zero. This is a fact, really behind dispute.

Either the Constitution is amended to correct this error, or the current situation will go on. That’s all there is to it.

Since the illegals damage the States and their budgets more than anything else, getting 38 states to ratify a simple amendment should be simple. Sending such an amendment TO the States for ratification is far from simple, however, since the Cheap Labor Express holds strong majorities in both Houses of Congress.


10 posted on 08/24/2015 6:40:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
Either the Constitution is amended to correct this error, or the current situation will go on. That’s all there is to it.

It's not an error. You are in error.

Since the illegals damage the States and their budgets more than anything else, getting 38 states to ratify a simple amendment should be simple.

Neither California, Massachusetts, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maryland, New York, Vermont, Oregon, New Jersey, nor Washington are likely to ratify such an amendment. You are full of crap.

33 posted on 08/24/2015 8:45:04 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
There is an easier way. Look at my previous message regarding the "Indian Citizenship Act of 1924."
39 posted on 08/24/2015 9:00:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

What if President Trump just told the court to f*ck off and that his administration would follow the plain meaning of the 14th and the extant statute that codifies it? Would SCOTUS send US Marshalls to arrest him?


93 posted on 08/24/2015 6:09:25 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson