I’m perplexed. She’s not a very good campaigner, either from a standpoint of strategy or personal appeal. I guess because she’s female and has a D beside her name makes the big difference. With an R, she’d already be in jail.
If she were an R and her name was "Petraeus", she'd be on probation.
It's been suggested that the Petraeus prosecution (or persecution) was just done to set things up for this. In comparison, Petraeus was prosecuted for driving 26MPH in a 25 MPH zone. Hillary was driving 180 MPH in a school zone without a license in a stolen car carrying bombs and machine guns.
(My guess is that Obama's own Rasputin, Valerie Jarrett, is behind this. It's waaaaaay too complicated for Obama.)
My other guess is that the planned sequence of events would be grand jury/indictments, followed by withdrawal from the race, followed by a presidential pardon.
It’s the “Clinton Machine” that protects her. Too many influential people, both domestic and foreign, have tons of money, via contributions to the Clinton Foundation and speaking fees, invested in her becoming President. If she is forced to withdraw, all that money and the potential influence that goes with it goes down the drain. Lots of jobs are involved too - employees and hangers-on of the Clinton Foundation, jobs at non-profits, who have contributed, who expect to receive grants, jobs at for-profit businesses, who have contributed, who expect to receive lucrative contracts, etc.
A lot of money and influence is at play here, that wasn’t available to poor old Petraeus.