Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo
This is the distinction that I've never heard Levin address. <<

How about “intent”...The fact as u state... “ Resident aliens (there was no such thing as an illegal alien at the time)” begs the question of why... “AND” subject to the jurisdiction is there for a reason.... as it is clearly applied to Indians and diplomats with out naming them....common sense would put anchorbabys in that same category of the times and again.... "intent'

92 posted on 08/22/2015 10:28:38 AM PDT by M-cubed ( Their hope is to find a way to pick a nominee who, if elected, would actually stay the course the w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: M-cubed
... it is clearly applied to Indians and diplomats with out naming them....common sense would put anchorbabys in that same category of the times

But diplomats and Indians for the most part had immunity from our laws - hence not subject to our jurisdiction. Illegals and their children did not have immunity. That seems to me to be the big distinction.

100 posted on 08/22/2015 12:44:53 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson