Actually, you did not. All you said was "nope".
Which left it open to interpretation, including possibility that I was that entity, whoever that was (you dragged that reference out of left field, from who knows where) leaving it all open-ended enough to include that it be as if I was not delivering as I'd advertised.
Which makes your above italicized response to be a form of misrepresentation. You said simply and only "nope". You did not say that it wasn't me, as you just attempted to assert that you said. You may have meant or intended that, but you didn't actually say that.
In this instance, this could have all been avoided if not for your own sloppiness, and unwillingness to amend your own statements, and that attempted to be provided cover for later by follow-up misrepresentation and distortion of what occurred.
So again, as per established pattern, there isn't a single little thing you've touch upon, that in your hands have not in some way been distorted or else contaminated, turning it all into yet another layer among layers of open-ended innuendo, misrepresentations, pointless distractions (while vainly trying to avoid ever needing to admit to your own errors) joined with your own opinions mistaken for "facts", leaving your statements in the end result, to have been form of lies all along, often much due to the contexts to where and how you've typically sought those assertions and opinions to apply.
In other words, as seemingly again it must be pointed out to you again;
Hope you choke.
Me: I said it WASN’T you.
You: Actually, you did not. All you said was “nope” Which left it open to interpretation, including possibility that I was that entity.”
Duh. NOPE means NOPE!
You: Hope you choke.
LOL! You are losing it.