Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123
A Boston Herald/Franklin Pierce University poll released earlier this month found Kasich in third place with 12 percent of the vote. Oh, so a bunch of lefties in Boston think Kasich is great.

Then they add However, in the Fox News national poll of GOP primary voters, Kasich came in a tie for seventh with just 4 percent of the vote. So he's actually 8th in a field of 16. Doesn't seem like he's climbed much since he announced.

I'm an Ohioan who has never voted for Kasich and I never will.
7 posted on 08/20/2015 5:29:43 AM PDT by neefer (Because you can't starve us out and you can't make us run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neefer; jimbo123; xzins; lbryce; raybbr; Buckeye McFrog; sarge83; Trumpinator; The Final Harvest
The PACs negotiating with each other or other candidates is business as usual (they are only not allowed to "coordinate" their activities with their candidate[s]) so there is nothing exciting in this news. This early in the campaign, they are using this time to check out and gauge who could be or become an ally (VP, cabinet, administrative position or promises of "sponsorship" of post-candidacy easy money or business opportunities) or who will be an earnest primary opponent.

The problem with the Trump campaign is that right now he is sucking all the [media and financial] oxygen from the smaller and poorly financed conservative candidates, who might shake out early being starved of funding and media attention (which is now deliberately soft "all-Donald-all-the-time").

Bush can afford to be "sitting this out" in the middle of the pack for now and keep raking in money for himself and his and GOP-e PACs, until the field gets a lot thinner and the non-Trump polled start shifting to better-known candidates still standing (i.e., better financed) who will also start getting more "free" media exposure. So then, the polls differential between Trump and smaller field will become much smaller and the "game" for 1-2 will be on...

At that point the conservatives will have lost many of their favorite candidates. Many of them, especially those put off by Trump's crude style or business dealings or his wealth or whatever (he is getting about 25% now, which is impressive in a field of 17 but less so in a field of 3 or 4) will default to Bush - "the name we know" and "he can win" and the other candidate[s] said something nice about Hillary or said something bad about "my" candidate, etc.

Don't underestimate Bush and GOP-e — "the more the merrier" is just fine with them for now, because they are collecting money and potential allies while the "Trump show" is essentially suffocating the smaller conservative fry, because they don't get media exposure (and therefore, financial support) and "normal" people who are not paying much attention to campaigns yet don't get the chance to know them.

33 posted on 08/20/2015 6:34:30 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson