Replies

No, I think the foreign soldier thing is addressed as an AG legal opinion some years after the 14th amendment passed. Not really sure about that though.

Again, you do realize that I OPPOSE the current interpretation of the 14th amendment that grants birthright citizenship to hordes of illegal alien babies. My point isn’t that it is correct, rather how do we change it?

The question is, as long as the Supreme Court interprets the 14th to grant birthright citizenship to the offspring of illegals, what can we do to stop it? Realistic options are what I am looking for. I don’t see any other than getting 4-5 new justices on the court that would rule that the 14th does NOT grant birthright to the babies of illegals.

Might be time to revisit in front of the court, and possibly have someone eloquent argue the case that indeed, these are invading hordes, irregulars, if you will,and not simply immigrants, and therefore their babies are not automatic citizens merely by location of birth.

Perhaps by virtue of them disobeying the basic laws of this country, before, during and after their border crossing, makes them invading horde, and not simply "undocumented" immigrants.

I believe that is the whole push behind the PC terminology change, as an effort to make the 14th read more favorable.