Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
Ted Cruz has a great plan.

Oh yeah how about posting it here, I would like to see if he mentions deport anywhere.

87 posted on 08/16/2015 11:10:19 AM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot; GeronL

Ted Cruz dad zero chance of getting elected.


127 posted on 08/16/2015 12:34:35 PM PDT by WilliamIII (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine; Red Steel; SaraJohnson; MilesVeritatis; SteveAustin; ...

These make for interesting reading.

Most legal citizens and traditional Americans and conservatives believe the birthright citizenship is just wrong. That it is legal is debatable. I did some research some years ago and believed that United States vs. Wong Kim Ark was the final word on the subject. It is after all a SCOTUS decision.

MIlesVERitatis and others suggest that the 14th is a smoke screen and that the Immigration and Nationality Acts of 1952, 1965 etc. are the real reason behind jus soli... Wong Kim Ark citizenship by birth.

I think it is past time to challenge U.S. vs Ark by any means including but not limited to defiance, amendment or new law and just let it get all balled up in the courts while the principle of jus soli is ignored.

Any thoughts?

Note particularly the statements on the 1952 veto by Truman and the response when the veto was over ridden. This is a LONG war.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952

The RATS reversed and perverted it in 1965.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965


130 posted on 08/16/2015 1:13:20 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchaned our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine; Red Steel; SaraJohnson; MilesVeritatis; SteveAustin; ...

Forgot to include U.S. vs Ark 1898.

These make for interesting reading.

Most legal citizens and traditional Americans and conservatives believe the birthright citizenship is just wrong. That it is legal is debatable. I did some research some years ago and believed that United States vs. Wong Kim Ark was the final word on the subject. It is after all a SCOTUS decision.

MIlesVERitatis and others suggest that the 14th is a smoke screen and that the Immigration and Nationality Acts of 1952, 1965 etc. are the real reason behind jus soli... Wong Kim Ark citizenship by birth and that by Act of Congress the practice can be reversed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark

I think it is past time to challenge U.S. vs Ark by any means including but not limited to defiance, amendment or new law and just let it get all balled up in the courts while the principle of jus soli is ignored.

Any thoughts?

Note particularly the statements on the 1952 veto by Truman and the response when the veto was over ridden. This is a LONG war.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952

The RATS reversed and perverted it in 1965.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965


131 posted on 08/16/2015 1:16:03 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchaned our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson