Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What everyone with a Top Secret security clearance knows – or should know
Reuters ^ | 8/3/15 | Peter van Buren

Posted on 08/14/2015 4:48:34 PM PDT by Faith Presses On

In the world of handling America’s secrets, words – classified, secure, retroactive – have special meanings. I held a Top Secret clearance at the State Department for 24 years and was regularly trained in protecting information as part of that privilege. Here is what some of those words mean in the context of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The Inspectors General for the State Department and the intelligence community issued a statement saying Clinton’s personal email system contained classified information. This information, they said, “should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.” The same statement voiced concern that a thumb drive held by Clinton’s lawyer also contains this same secret data. Another report claims the U.S. intelligence community is bracing for the possibility that Clinton’s private email account contains multiple instances of classified information, with some data originating at the CIA and NSA.

A Clinton spokesperson responded that “Any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, and not at the time they were transmitted.” Clinton claims unequivocally her email contained no classified information, and that no message carried any security marking, such as Confidential or Top Secret.

The key issue in play with Clinton is that it is a violation of national security to maintain classified information on an unclassified system.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: emails; hillary; hillaryclinton; server
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Rome2000

She wouldn’t have those who know she’s lying believe that. Just “swing voters” who don’t know much about politics, and the true believers on the left.


41 posted on 08/14/2015 8:03:08 PM PDT by Faith Presses On ("After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: usnavy_cop_retired

I almost lost my TS clearance while on active duty (USAF 1974-1983) because I blanked the daughter of a Czechoslovakian ambassador once. OSI came to my barracks to confront me about it and let me know that any further contact with her would be detrimental to my clearances. I never saw her again. Hillary had the daughter and sister to members of the Muslim Brotherhood overseeing her every move at the State Department. I just shake my head.


42 posted on 08/14/2015 8:26:49 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, John F. Kerry, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice — all of them — ARE security risks. However, there are many, many more. Treason flows like a river through these people.
43 posted on 08/14/2015 11:06:09 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( Barbara Daly Danko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

There is no security, except in risk. That’s just nature.


44 posted on 08/14/2015 11:16:38 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

The interesting part is that most classified transmissions of this sort are on the SIPRNet or the Top Secret version of it - and it isn’t supposed to have any way to be transmitted outside that controlled environment. When you get into other constraints, such as SCI, there are even more snags - someone probably had to do some gymnastics to get classified data onto a unsecured network. IOW, the normal safeguards make it so one has no doubt they’re breaking the rules/laws as they have to take specific actions to defeat the safeguards.


45 posted on 08/15/2015 3:55:42 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson