[Andy from Chapel Hill]

Is this letter legally binding on the recipient?

Is it a Subpoena?

[Qiviut]

Looks to me like he’s ‘asking’ .... just my opinion. He cites at the end of the letter where the Committee is authorized & what it can look into. Platte River is lawyered up ... no telling if they’ll cooperate or not at this point, although they are in really ‘deep’ since they had no security clearances. They’ve also been involved in some other really sketchy stuff - I’m wondering if whoever hired them for Hillary’s server knew about it and chose them because of it. What a tangled web .....

EXCLUSIVE: Tech company which maintained Hillary’s secret server was sued for ‘illegally accessing’ database and ‘stealing White House military advisers’ phone numbers’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3197093/Tech-company-maintained-Hillary-s-secret-server-sued-illegally-accessing-databases-creating-chaos-stealing-White-House-phone-numbers.html

An article with more info:
Senate committee seeks email facts from Clinton’s tech company
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article30964044.html

[ClayinVA]

It does not matter when it comes to Classified data. Homeland Security has been known to walk in and take the whole server and the backups over one email. They use the National Security Act of 1947, and normally they have or can get a warrant pretty easy.