BS
Lets say you are against murder
does than mean you should never study the cadaver of someone who was murdered?
Should you never study the cadaver of someone who was a murderer?
Your post was ridiculous
Well that depends...Was the murderer paid for the cadaver by the person doing the study? and if he was wouldn’t he want to murder again to get more money?
Not sure I understand what research on the murderer has to do with anything as nobody has of yet suggested we study the brains of planned parenthood’s abortionists, but maybe you are on to something:)
ME’s autopsy homicide victim’s all the time, they are paid however by the city government not the murderers.
By the way I am against murder and I hope you are too, not to be would indeed be ridiculous.
Ridiculous, indeed. Cadavers for prosections were highly valued and respected and maintained by the pathology departments of teaching hospitals. But they might do it differently in Central America. It is all about how the cadaver is obtained—
Her post is ridiculous. You do not have to walk very far in most medical schools to see the “baby in the bottle”—generally a stillborn donated by the mother. While individual medical students do not dissect every cadaver, there are preserved “pro sections” — already dissected— where the bodies are peeled back to show placement of organs. And those with sick children should be thankful for their presence and the donation. Jumping to the conclusion that such would be the product of a murder is offensive and ignorant in the extreme.