Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

Here was my take on Akin: he was NOT tea party guy...he’d been in the House for six years, or six terms, not sure which - meaning he was damned near part of the establishment. He was self serving, paying his entire family out of campaign funds, and he was too arrogant and ignorant to know exactly what Claire dear is admitting to...she created Akin so she could beat him, because she knew that Bruner or Steelman would rock her clock in the general.

Akin only glommed onto the tea party thing AFTER the primary when both many in the TP and the GOP - e said NO to him. It was a rare case when the estabs were correct....only they didn’t want to claim him as one of their own, which he was.


19 posted on 08/12/2015 6:33:16 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Much of my support for Akin was a simply reactionary resistance to the establishment.


21 posted on 08/12/2015 6:35:27 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Akin was one of the founders of the Tea Party Caucus. He was rated "A" by NRA/GOA/ and many Conservative groups. He favored tax reform. Pro-Life.

He never should have appeared on Jaco's radio show. Roy Blunt and other Republican "advisors" offered to coach him prior to his making the circuit. He refused. Stubborn, from beginning to end.

35 posted on 08/12/2015 6:54:32 AM PDT by donozark (We grow too soon old and too late smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson