Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh so inconvenient, Trump actually has a detailed and reasonable position that might be acceptable to lots of folks: No public money to PP so long as they carry out abortions. What is wrong with that? Once they stop abortions, paying for reasonable and acceptable medical care should not be controversial. As the article points out, this puts everyone in a corner since abortions are supposed to be a small $ part of their operation, thus his approach is achievable and is women-friendly.


9 posted on 08/11/2015 9:05:28 PM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

Without abortions, and with obamacare, there is no need for PP period. obamacare pays for all the poor peoples’ medical needs. Huh? No? That’s what the democrats say.


55 posted on 08/12/2015 6:00:09 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Since you're so much smarter than me, don't waste your time insulting me. I won't understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson