Perhaps it is accurate to say that science has not proven that Chris Cuomo is a human life.
</sarcasm> added.When Chris Cuomo was conceived, a unique DNA defined so many of his characteristics, within the variability of identical twins, that his very name, “Chris Cuomo” might as well be entailed in that sequence.
But what, after all, is the difference between an aborted baby and the African lion recently so much in the news? I put it to you that their similarity lies in the fact that each had a fully-defined genetic code - but, by and large, the difference between them boils down to “Cecil.”
It is well-known to farmers that farm children may love steak, but they will be revolted at the idea of eating “Daisy.” Even so, might not a pregnant woman be revolted at the concept of killing “Virgina” or “George?"
Imagine how the calculus might be modified if the DNA of every aborted child were officially preserved. Such that, in principle, future developments in the analysis of human DNA might one day computationally synthesize what that person would have matured to look like, and even to behave like. How many women could actually elect for termination of a baby with that prospect in view?
That's true!