Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Correct me if I'm wrong but did not Fiorina say that she would not replace a single retiring federal worker? Are not judges federal workers?

Judges don't work for the executive branch. You are working this point hard, but it doesn't work for you. You are really stretching, perhaps because you don't like Carly. If her idea a total solution? Of course not. Can it be applied as a blanket solution in every case? Of course not. Is it a starting point? Of course! At least she is suggesting ideas on what she could do within the bounds of the law, the Constitution and political reality to actually start reversing the growth of government. If you have better ideas, why not post them?

67 posted on 08/10/2015 11:22:20 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative
You are really stretching, perhaps because you don't like Carly.

I freely admit that I am not impressed with her. At all.

Can it be applied as a blanket solution in every case? Of course not.

But that is what she is saying. She will not replace a single, solitary retiring government worker, is her position. It's not "I won't replace a single retiring government worker...unless they are in air traffic control or the Border Patrol or the Secret Service or work for the VA, etc., etc. She is advocating a blanket solution. And I'm calling her out on it and saying it is idiotic. But entirely in keeping with her campaign.

69 posted on 08/10/2015 11:29:42 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson