He threatened to run third party if he was unfairly excluded from debates as the clear frontrunner. That’s a very correct thing to do. If the far and away frontrunner gets excluded by party apparachiks they should expect him to. SO the premise of her question was misleading, he was not excluded from the debate. She implied if he lost fair contests he would then run third. He never said that.
And the question I was referring to was when she was hammering his with a bunch of sexist sounding quotes. She has no credibility to judge that. And it could have been done to ANY candidate on that stage. It isn’t conservative to do character assassination.
She had a short chance to ask something that mattered. With the state of our nation and the world. That was her big question. It is in the category of boxers or briefs.
you’re making excuses for a guy that is threatening to usher in the second coming of the clinton administration unless all the right people don’t kiss his ass to his satisfaction.
any conservative that has not taken the devil’s shilling knows that this guy is a disaster in the making..