I thought I’d add a couple thoughts on Megyn v. Trump:
Trump is the candidate. He is free to do whatever he chooses, including making a buffoon of himself, as he bears the consequences. Clearly, he was wrong to say something that could be interpreted in a sexist way. Hence, he sent out a twitter to say that wasn’t the proper inference. I don’t follow the man religiously, but that was the first time I ever heard him apologize.
Kelly is a news correspondent. She has an obligation to her news organization to be fair and balanced. She asked tough questions of Trump, indeed, so did the panel to all the candidates. But, Trump was correct, they were gunning for him. They gave disproportionate time to certain candidates at the expense of others. And, their questions were skewed toward personality issues with regard to Trump. In my judgment, these were minor mistakes. Re-calibrate and move on.
Overall, I think the debate was the best pre-nomination debate in history. I think this was #1 because of Donald Trump, his persona, and his infusion of candor into the race, and #2 because of the Fox News team.
>> Clearly, he was wrong to say something that could be interpreted in a sexist way.
He said the same thing regarding Chris Wallace in the same conversation.
http://www.google.com/#q=Trump+Chris+Wallace+Blood+Eyes
Do you floss after regurgitating Faux RINO dung, or do you leave the little green chunks between your teeth?