Replies

Thank you for posting that image..having the head of the DNC on right after the debate (With NO rebuttal) pissed me off much more than anything Megyn Kelly said to Donald Trump, that right there..that slime ball, just sitting there going on and on about how much she hates Republicans and hated the debate..did Fox News really think she would say ANYTHING objective..I wonder if CNN after the Democratic Debate will allow the head of the GOP on to discuss their opinion of the debate, I highly doubt it

I'm right there with you, but I didn't stick around to watch that interview. By that time, I was posting my message to Megyn on her Face Book and writing to Fox News to voice my complaints.

FNC continues to defend its debate, but it was actually "an inquisition of some, a coronation of others, and it was, entirely lacking in value to be able to compare each 'product' on the stage with the other." ~ Breitbart.

Megyn Kelly purposely made it personal, and purposely inserted herself into both the debate and after-debate. She must always be the star!

Prior to the debate, I can't count the number of times I heard Megyn and Chris Stiles talking on her show about how delightfully pleased they were regarding the questions she was going to pose to Trump and others. Even Chris Wallace was bragging about "doozies."

All this hoopla about "poor Megyn the victim" is both "stupid" and misplaced. The real victims of Megyn are the 24 million viewers who do not know that Rupert Murdoch had ordered "the hit on Trump."

I'm certain that Face Book's owner (co-sponsor of the debate) also negotiated (leveraged) that after-debate interview with Wasserman-Shultz and that Kelly happily followed through with Murdoch's blessing!

And yet, these same people and more are blasting Trump for stating that he wasn't going to take that GOP pledge "at this time," because it was "his leverage."

I'm still sick and have been sleeping 18 hours, so I've not been able to follow the news.