Posted on 08/07/2015 12:23:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
So, who exactly is going to get the polution fine?
I propose they write the penalty check to the EPA. It could be a perpetual motion money machine...the more they spill, the richer they get.
Time to reign in the EPA.
EPA above its own laws?
The EPA, now to be known as the EKA, the Environmental Kakistocracy Agency
I’ll lay 2-1 odds that the person responsible is quietly transferred, or tries to blame mine personnel, and suffers no repercussions.
Bookmark
I understand that this was an EPA mandated cleanup, but did they file the proper plans and receive the proper permits? Did they have an emergency plan to fall back on if this exact instance could have occurred?
The permits for the projects that I have worked on in the past and currently working on all require varying degree of protection of the environment and none of them is easy to obtain. I don’t care if it a parking lot for a mom and pop store or a bridge over a river. And you can better believe there was no lax oversight on any of those by the regulatory agency.
Has the EPA ever actually cleaned up so much as an ounce of water?
The actual release of the hazardous material was done by an EPA employee, not mine personnel.
How about the state of Colorado, who can then use the money to actually clean up the EPA’s mess?
“So, who exactly is going to get the polution fine?”
The gold mine owners, who else?
Sad to see...
I’ve been along that creek and river every few years since the early 1970s.
Looks like the EPA is responsible for more damage than the miners - most of that stuff would have been locked up in the mines underground where it originated. Yeah, there was stuff that was brought in for the processing during mining operations, but the bulk of the material was in the ground.
Not far from this area (Summitville), the EPA was spent around 500 million dollars cleaning up a mine that was claimed to be leaching acid - which was why there were no fish in the streams. After all that money was spent and 30+ years have gone into the cleanup, the EPA has had to admit that the acid in the creeks was runoff from the open rock faces of the mountain - NOT the mine. Clueless fools.
This will just be an opening for the EPA to sue the mine and land owners for allowing them, the EPA, this opportunity to create an environmental disaster [attractive nuisance]. Even though the mine was abandoned, the land is still owned by someone, so there is a chain of responsibility for the deep legal pockets of the US Government to go after.
Remember the lesson of Lois Learner, no one in government is ever responsible unless it is in the interest of the illiberal intelligensia (Scooter Libby). Remember the immortal words of the activist government, “Never let a good crisis go to waste!”
I understood that too. My point was they are not exempt form state and local permitting process
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
