Your posts are incoherent.
You are the one who said in post #3 that this was a desperate Bush setup.
And I responded to that nonsense from you in post #10 because Bush did not force Trump to call him or Bill to Call Trump (as we don’t know who called who).
Your post (post #3, which I responded to in post #10) is the one that was utterly ridiculous and incoherent.
The only thing more incoherent than that post from you is the excuses given by RINOS as to why Trump would donate to Ed Rendell in Pennsylvania or donate to Hillary.
“Your posts are incoherent.”
No, the support of Trump is incoherent. Laissez-faire is just pointing out why.