I wonder if it can be made a case for Uninformed Consent. They failed to inform patients.
I bet the forms the "patient" (mother) has to fill out include language that covers the disposition of "the products of conception."
I've no doubt that Planned Personhood engaged the best attorneys money can buy to prepare the language in those forms.
In fact, I would expect that if Planned Personhood were to be advised by its attorneys that they couldn't quite cover a certain eventuality in the agreement under the provisions of existing law in a given state, P-P would simply go to the legislature of that state and get the language of the law changed in whatever ways necessary to make sure that eventuality was covered.
Cost no object. We're talking a virtually unlimited flow of money here, which is ultimately what this is all about.
A "woman's right to choose" is simply a means to an end.