Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sontagged

Changing the subject doesn’t make you any more intelligent, just the opposite


44 posted on 08/03/2015 7:33:27 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin; 2ndDivisionVet
LOL. Obviously you didn't understand the WND article and how it fits in with Karen Handel's book.

I'll try to explain. After Sarah Palin’s first endorsement of Karen Handel in 2010, Handel gets a job with Susan G Komen and stumbles into the astonishing fact Karl Rove is protecting Planned Parenthood monies from being defunded, behind the scenes.

The fact Rove is running PP monies in 2011 is very telling, since Obama has been President for three years. This means whatever Rove is doing in 2011, was going on when his boss was President as well. It is also telling that for the Establishment Elites, there is no such thing as "right" or "left" politics -- only their shared goals and motivations.

This GOPe/Dem collusion is what so stunned Karen Handel, the Palin and Tea Party conservative.

Now, this is what an actual “behind the scenes plot” or “insane Uniparty conspiracy regarding the killing of babies in the womb” looks like.

Why it is so surreptitious, why it is done with such subterfuge, we can only speculate (with some reasonable certainty) that it's because Rove doesn't want people to know his goals are the same as Obama's goals regarding abortion; nor does the Bush GOPe want people to know they have exactly the same belief systems as Democrats on abortion.

Whatever "intelligence" I might possess tells me this is a political plot to deceive people about the realities of aborting babies and selling dead baby parts for cash in this country.

And whatever spiritual I.Q. I might possess tells me there has to be an even darker spiritual aspect to what amounts to merchandising human sacrifice, because the Planned Parenthood revelations go WAY beyond run-of-the-mill "liberal vs conservative" politics.

In other words, "Demonic" may not just be Ann Coulter's metaphoric snark, but an actuality.

But let's go back to the WND article so you can read it at your own personal comprehension speed:

“So, where do I get the $2.2 billion figure? I get it from Jim Sedlak of the American Life League, an expert on Planned Parenthood and its federal funding.

In an interview, Jim tells me yes, the Bush administration has indeed “extensively” funded Planned Parenthood, the total amount of federal funding (through 2006, the most recent figures known) being at least $2.2 billion.

In Bush’s first year (2001), he approved $202 million for PP; in the last year for which there is reporting (2006), Bush gave PP $337 million – a single year funding increase of 67 percent. Sedlak notes that in 2006, PP showed a $114 million profit so did not need federal funding.

And “yes, certainly,” Jim says, every federal tax dollar given PP frees up one of its other dollars to pay for abortions. He adds: “And there are dollars that go into Planned Parenthood, especially state dollars, that pay for abortions. There are Medicaid programs, for example, that actually pay for abortions in some of the states. So some of this [federal] money goes directly to abortions.”

Jim says he has “no good answer” as to why Bush, supposedly pro-life, supposedly a “compassionate conservative,” would OK giving $2.2 billion in federal tax dollars to a group as evil as PP. He adds that he and others were hopeful that when Bush was elected he would cut off all Title 10 money to PP, “but he never has.”

When asked if over the years his group and other pro-life people have asked Bush or his people to cut off all PP federal funding, Jim says: “Yes, we made it absolutely clear that it is outrageous that Planned Parenthood continues to get all of this money.”

So, what did Bush and his people say? “They gave no legitimate excuse for not cutting off the money. They told us this is difficult to do, they were working on it, they had to deal with Congress, etc. There was no substantive answer.”

Jim says that under President Bush, “Planned Parenthood has gotten more and more [federal] money every year – a slightly greater increase than under President Clinton.”

I tell Jim about what Bush said in a debate with Kerry in 2004: “We’re not going to spend taxpayers’ money on abortion.” I tell him that that after only 30 minutes or so worth of phone calls, I found out that federal tax dollars under Bush were being spent on abortion by Medicare, Medicaid and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Q: Do you know of any other federal tax dollars paying for abortion during Bush’s administration?

A: Yes. We learned that Planned Parenthood opened an abortion clinic in Fairbanks, Alaska (2004 or so). The Department of the Interior had some sort of jurisdiction over the Eskimos living in that area, and they were paying for some of the Eskimos to get abortions.

Q: So, under Bush, our federal tax dollars have paid for Eskimo abortions?

A: That’s what we were told.

Arghhh!"

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2008/10/79317/#6IbZjKs3PcL4BYTF.99

51 posted on 08/03/2015 1:49:11 PM PDT by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson