Posted on 08/02/2015 4:55:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
I think using the term “Dame” in reference to Hillary is an affront to dames everywhere (for both the haughty context, and the cruder American slang kind.)
The only literary context for her for me comes out of Shakespeare; specifically, the “Three Witches” kind.
She is an ineffective presidents wife and thats all. The danger is we now have another ineffective hateful anti american president who has one up on hildabeast he has a wife who is all of the above and shes black.
All one needs is a judge in the right position, who has no skeletons in his closet and no allegiance to progressive rats.
A tall order, admittedly.
“Dame” is German for Lady, she is no Lady
Also an English title of sorts. Like I said - in any context, the reference is absurd if connected to her.
Bill is Slick Willy and Hill is Slippery Slope.
An ex-President.
Here's why nothing sticks to the old witch ...
Teflon, my azz. Hillary is and has been for a long time CORRUPT TO THE CORE!!
She’s not teflon. Rather the media is failing at its job. The MSM is either willfully blind to, or complicit in (same thing) her crimes.
I do not understand the negative campaigning among people of the same party. Each campaign should be positive. This is my position. This is may plan. Here’s my goal and my approach. Instead, they waste precious resources with vitriolic attacks that leave a bad taste in the mouths of their supporters and alienate the supporters of the candidates they vanquish. They need to use honey, rather than vinegar.
DNC hauled in VP wannabe Castro ...... and other Democrats....to an on-campus rah-rah session for Hillary....but few millenials showed up.
In other bad news----a "Young Americans for Hillary Party" had no takers.
Satan’s daughter.
“Felony” Clinton bump
I remember in the 2004 presidential election when all of rat candidates acted like as if they wanted to share the presidency
“I do agree with you, but on the other hand aren’t they competing against each other? “
Products compete against each other all the time. The winner is the one that distinguishes itself as better. You can either build up your side or tear down the other. But the latter approach leaves collateral damage. I don’t recall Reagan going negative. (But I think some of his supporters did.)
It’s not that she’s coated with Teflon, it’s that the Men Seeking Men mediums keep wiping her ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.