Posted on 08/01/2015 9:12:31 AM PDT by Mariner
The Littoral Combat Ship, built by Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) and Austal USA, has been plagued with cost overruns, design flaws, and a number of failures. In fact, the LCS performed so poorly that then-Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel cut the Navy's LCS acquisition from 52 to 32 ships, and directed the Navy to appoint a Small Surface Combatant Task Force, or SSCTF, to "submit alternative proposals to procure a capable and lethal small surface combatant, consistent with the capabilities of a frigate."
The good news is Lockheed Martin addressed many of the issues plaguing the LCS, and now production is surging as the price has dropped. The bad news is the Navy has decided it wants a modified LCS -- which it's officially calling a frigate -- for ships 33-52. So, what does this mean for Lockheed Martin?
(Excerpt) Read more at fool.com ...
Shoot and run.
Patrolling waters that a Capital ship has no business plying.
These ships should cost about $250-300mil each.
While3 we're at it we should build and procure about 50 small DE subs.
$400mil each.
Sure, why not?
I’ll get my cookie jar.
About building a plane to support ground forces an air force general said, “Look, if it isn’t faster and flying higher than the last one, I don’t even want to hear about it.”
I think the Navy has the same mindset. Nobody wants to command a tiny ship. They want big ones costing lots of money. It’s about ego and it’s about promotions.
Bring back corvettes, destroyer escorts and patrol boats.
bump
I’d like to bring back my corvettes..
How much armor does an LCS carry?
They look like bait for can openers
They have their role in small numbers...the Brown Water fleet.
But right now we don't have enough Blue Water platforms.
Just patrolling the Western Pacific, showing presence and deterrence, is problematic.
A squadron of Corvettes each in Subic, Yokosuka and Bahrain would be quite useful.
MAYBE another in the Med somewhere.
Right now the only options a commander has to keep a presence is a 10,000 ton "Destroyer".
There's not an armored ship is US inventory.
They use compartmentalization instead.
Your pic did not come through./
Fun and games in the Taiwan Strait? If another Dem is elected they’d probably send every carrier named after a Republican with “Shoot Me!” painted in radar reflective paint on their sides.
Not much and that was one of their major initial complaints.
That and major subsystems problems.
you are correct..
Right click and open the pic. Of LCS ship.
USN/DoD strike again with requirements creep...and people wonder why defense programs are "out of control"...the idiots in Acquisition don't pay for these, taxpayers do and then the contractors get drawn and quartered for price increases and schedule delays...
Not arguing the viability or not of the LCS at all...just generally arguing about the system as a whole.
The LCS is a joke as a combat vessels. It’s biggest defense is that a cruise missile might go in one side and out the other without exploding.
They don’t carry enough crew to fight and take care of damage. They have no real offensive weapons.
Right now we are in a bad position in the China Sea and Middle East without enough ships to keep the sea lanes open. Without the support of India and Singapore we would be in worse shape.
We need to rebuild the Navy and build more subs..even DE’s.
Just get forbidden on link and pic above
RTFM. Don’t click on it, copy and paste!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
