Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

“Recording a conversation with a person without so advising them is prohibited in California.”

It isn’t in MN, I know that for a fact. Very few states are actually two party states. Of course if you record something across state lines (video conference or telephone for example), then Federal law comes into play, which requires all parties are aware of recording.


35 posted on 07/29/2015 5:28:24 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1
Of course if you record something across state lines (video conference or telephone for example), then Federal law comes into play, which requires all parties are aware of recording.

Actually, Federal Law only requires one party to be aware that the conversation is being recorded, just like in Texas. There are only 12 states that require consent from all parties.
54 posted on 07/29/2015 8:11:30 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson