So multiple “systems of religion” are “supported”? Is that it? Pretty weak. In fact these judges need to pull their heads out of their collective asses. The monument supports the foundation of Western Civilization - the very system within which these judges operate.
> The politician who paid for the original monument to be installed is also an ordained Baptist minister. You could say that he benefits politically.
He is running for office? Is his name displayed on government property?
Everyone knows that the monument was not erected to support Western Civilization in general (which probably has multiple foundations). The monument was put there with a religious and political purpose.
The politician who paid for the original monument to be installed is also an ordained Baptist minister. You could say that he benefits politically.
He is running for office? Is his name displayed on government property?
He'll have to run next year if he wants to stay in office. Since his name was on the monument and that was on government property, his name was displayed on government property. Apparently a mentally ill person destroyed the original monument. I haven't checked if the same name is on the replacement monument but it is supposed to be identical.