Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court denies request for rehearing in Ten Commandments case
NewsOk ^ | 7/27/2015 | Rick M. Green

Posted on 07/27/2015 3:42:49 PM PDT by GoneSalt

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has rejected a last ditch attempt by the state to keep a Ten Commandments monument next to the Oklahoma Capitol.

The court ordered it removed, and on Monday denied a request from the state to reconsider that order.

The monument must be removed because it violates a section of the Oklahoma Constitution prohibiting state property from being used to further religions, the court said.

"Obviously we're pleased with the decision," said Brady Henderson, legal director for ACLU Oklahoma. "The whole case is controversial, but something that is undeniable is that the court is getting this right. The court is following the law."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: commandments; ten
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2015 3:42:49 PM PDT by GoneSalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

However, SCOTUS would gladly take a Petition
for Certiorari to protect a statue of Satan
having intercourse with a baby and a goat
on an American flag.


2 posted on 07/27/2015 3:44:46 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

A Nation that turns from God deserves the punishment that is surely coming!
Freegards
LEX


3 posted on 07/27/2015 3:46:34 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

Then leave it.


4 posted on 07/27/2015 3:46:51 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

The ACLU representing Muslims, atheists, queers and commies everywhere. Built on hate for decency in America they do the bidding of the hate-mongers on the left.


5 posted on 07/27/2015 3:47:38 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

Figures.


6 posted on 07/27/2015 3:51:42 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Let the pinheads justices come down in their black robes and try to move it themselves.


7 posted on 07/27/2015 3:57:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt
Why is it precedent can be used to argue a matter and sway a decision a particular way, but a hundred years of un-challenged existence can not be used as a precedent to sway THIS particular matter ?

(I invented the hundred years ... but you get my meaning)

8 posted on 07/27/2015 3:57:36 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
That's MY first thought, too .... in ALL of these "decisions"

Clerk in the courthouse ... "No" .... don't give a reason, just say No.

9 posted on 07/27/2015 3:59:07 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt; All
Thank you for referencing that article GoneSalt. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"The monument must be removed because it violates a section of the Oklahoma Constitution prohibiting state property from being used to further religions, the court said."

This appears to be entirely a 10th Amendment issue. If legal majority voters in OK would allow religious displays on state property, but don’t lift a finger to work with their state lawmakers to appropriately amend OK’s constitution, then that is their problem.

10 posted on 07/27/2015 4:00:18 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

The Ten Commandments appear in multiple locations on the U.S. Supreme Court building, they are our foundation.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/symbolsoflaw.pdf

Until recently moving to the Oklahoma Judicial Center (a renovated, re-purposed building) the Oklahoma Supreme Court was housed in the Oklahoma state capitol and, I believe, still has courtrooms in that building. Why shouldn’t the Ten Commandments be on the Capitol grounds?

Oklahoma state property is not being used to further religions, rather is is being used to acknowledge the foundation of our society and jurisprudence. Does the Oklahoma court reject those foundations? If so, what foundations have they substituted?


11 posted on 07/27/2015 4:02:29 PM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt
The monument must be removed because it violates a section of the Oklahoma Constitution prohibiting state property from being used to further religions, the court said.

That sounds like an open and shut case. I thought everyone around here was in favor of following the constitution.

12 posted on 07/27/2015 4:02:32 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

If that monument comes down in Oklahoma, there is no hope for America.


13 posted on 07/27/2015 4:04:22 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

DEFY THEM!!! The state justice department reports to the administrative branch... don’t enforce. If you have the guts don’t enforce.

Decide which side you will stand with. The court and the devil or God. Pick one.


14 posted on 07/27/2015 4:05:09 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (I don't see how we have kept going this long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

I would not want to be one of these judges when they come before God and have to explain this to Him.


15 posted on 07/27/2015 4:05:09 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

I live in north central OK.
OK has been having a lot of earthquakes recently, i know... but we rarely feel them here AT ALL where I live.

Today we felt a very significant one that lasted almost half a minute. We have only felt 2-3 in the last few years. This one today was the second strongest we ever felt.

Connection? who knows... just sayin.


16 posted on 07/27/2015 4:08:40 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

Sell the land that the monument currently sits on to a private group. Problem solved.


17 posted on 07/27/2015 4:09:58 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded; Ray76

Read Ray76’s post #11

This isn’t the “furthering” of religion - the monument is simply an acknowledgment of the principles that are inextricably woven into the fabric of our nation. To remove them is to rend our nation.

The monument demands exactly *zero* compulsion to even agree with the 10 Commandments, much less conform to them.


18 posted on 07/27/2015 4:10:35 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

“We were just following orders”

;’(


19 posted on 07/27/2015 4:11:37 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

According to that link, Confucius and Muhammad also appear on the U.S. Supreme Court building, along with Moses. Is sounds like the Ten Commandments are only depicted as the numerals I to X.


20 posted on 07/27/2015 4:16:17 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson