Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

I’m probably being misunderstood. I don’t mean to imply that they’re appalled by Hillary, or that they’re suddenly civic minded, or that they are conservative. I think they’re out to scoop other news agencies on obvious stories. I think whoever is leaking to them also says that if you don’t write it we’ll give it to the Washington Post. So self interest makes them do their job.


41 posted on 07/27/2015 7:51:40 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: elhombrelibre
No prob, on that score I think you've got a point, although it is true that the Clinton Cash author initiated the search and dug up most of the dirt they are talking about.

I do think the NYT is half protecting her, and half warning her: I read their main point as: "Unless you can show us you are a great candidate, bow out gracefully or this could get ugly." Like I said, it's a shot across her bow caboose.

She will respond if she can, if not she bows out gracefully without going to prison or harassed for her illegal $$$ influence peddling, nor her illegal emails.

48 posted on 07/27/2015 8:37:39 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson