“She praised Iowa for generating 40 percent of its energy from wind and said the nation needed to build “a clean energy economy” with the help of tax incentives.”
Yes more Solyndra cronyism.
Heh. She wants her fair share of the Tom Steyer cash.
It was ever thus.
Real time mix mix on the MISO footprint;
https://www.misoenergy.org/MarketsOperations/RealTimeMarketData/Pages/FuelMix.aspx
If she would shut her lying yap, I bet that alone would decrease a good percentage of the earth’s hot air.
MISO real time price map, https://www.misoenergy.org/LMPContourMap/MISO_All.html
Wind is 991MW as of this post that is about 1%.
Fool, she isn’t picking up one more vote that she didn’t already have patronized this group of single issue zombie freaks.
40 percent of its energy from wind —
Without checking anything, I call BS.
(At this rate, just doubling current capability would be 80%, or almost all its needs).
Maybe, just maybe, 40 percent of the cost of energy to consumers is from the wind energy (inflated, due to ‘green’ preference, etc.).
Texas leads the nation in wind energy...virtually all of which would shut down if the generous subsidies from the federal government go away. With the crash In oil prices, there is no reason to prop up alternative energy boondoggles, and that includes ethanol.
Is her message going to be classified? I don’t trust her, Hillary lies !
Perhaps it is time to see which Dormbama directive will start CW-II.
Hillary: With your help and with tax incentives we can shutdown the power plants, cap off the wells and close the gas stations.
Well lets just spike energy costs a couple hundred percent, require carbon taxes, and take a much bigger chunk of the family budget to prevent the sky from falling on chicken little.
That is what the democrats want, lets just put it out there and let the people decide what they are willing to pay for.
promises ‘rEally high goals’..
Id be shocked if she didnt.
You can put up all the wind generators that you want and say “potentially they will generate 40% of our energy needs.” The fact is that wind is fickle and doesn’t always do what you think it will. The first 20% is easy because they have already used the known sweet spots. The next 20% will be a very expensive experiment in trying to locate areas that have an adequate prevailing wind in order to get a payback on the generator. Putting up generators doesn’t mean you will get sufficient output of electricity to justify the cost.
Of course Hillary doesn’t know this. After all what difference does it make, it sounds good.
Things are going to heat up for her someday.
Did Cankles think of looking in the mirror?
