Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

You write checks your assumptions cannot cash.

Plus put your life in the basis of bad training for the inexperienced and untrusted.

Your former Condition 3 training was borne of politics, not safety.

.02


21 posted on 07/25/2015 8:03:09 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

>>Your former Condition 3 training was borne of politics, not safety.

Explain the politics of my training in 1980 and how it had nothing to do with safety.


22 posted on 07/25/2015 8:08:17 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

I was an MP from 98 till 06 , and we always carried condition 2. with our M11 or when I was with CID the M9. this included state side when we pulled airport duty post 9 11. why on earth would someone carry on duty condition 3 is beyond me. should you need your weapon one handed you would be a screwed chicken having to chamber a round. The M11 or the older 1911 are both designed to be carried condition 1.The M11 adds double action for a safe condition 2 carry as well.


30 posted on 07/25/2015 8:53:12 AM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson